When she was an Arkansas breadwinner and political wife she backed the company. No, the difference isn’t Wal-Mart, it’s Mrs. Clinton was part of the board responsible for its practices. We’re not aware of any big differences between Wal-Mart’s practices now and its practices in 1992 when Mrs. Clinton has “serious differences” with the company’s practices. Now, an aide explained to the Associated Press, Mrs. Clinton’s husband was an Arkansas politician and she was the real breadwinner in the family, she served, between 19, as a member of Wal-Mart’s corporate board of directors. So what are New Yorkers to make of Senator Clinton’s apparent desire to distance herself from the company? It can’t be that there’s something intrinsic to Wal-Mart with which Mrs. Given the well-funded propaganda campaign that has been waged against Wal-Mart by its competitors and the labor unions, the ability of New York voters to see through to the facts is heartening.
The poll found that even in union households, 63% said if there was a Wal-Mart in their community they would shop there. The same day Senate records disclosed that Senator Clinton returned a $5,000 contribution from the political action committee of Wal-Mart, Quinnipiac University released a poll of 1,072 New York City registered voters and found that 51% of them support Wal-Mart opening stores in the city, while a scant 37% oppose it.
0 kommentar(er)
